We
are wrapping up an interesting exercise at the office where we have each rewritten
our job description. The process included input from peers, bosses, and direct
reports. We identified tasks currently charged to us that we believe belong
elsewhere in the organization as well as overlaps and gaps, issues that will
generate thoughtful negotiations. It will be someone’s job (possibly mine) to recreate
this exercise periodically to ensure that work flows and changes in the
marketplace and the organization are incorporated so that all job descriptions
remain relevant and current.
Wouldn’t
it be helpful if all the roles in our lives came with job descriptions? And if
we had to occasionally review them? For parents, partners, colleagues, friends,
lovers to intentionally discuss who does what, plus the why and how? As
children grow, as parents age, as circumstances change, to revisit
expectations? As relationships deepen and broaden, such reviews may happen
organically. But, it sure is easy to get in a rut and not allow dynamics to
shift, or the people involved to evolve, or to get hung up on semantics, for I
recall times in my career when title and positions on org charts mattered.
Perhaps
more important, particularly after the headlines this week, would be for us to
examine our collective job description as decent human beings. To have those
hard discussions about how we deal with the marginalized. About the language we
use to address one another. About the issue of power. And for each of us to
prioritize how we utilize resources to reflect that job description, for this is the job for which we will be held most accountable. If we want our
legacy to be a job well done, the process starts with a detailed job
description focused on equity and equality.
As part of the MLK remembrances, I have begun hearing more about the revival/reinvigoration/re-inventing of the Poor Peoples'Campaign. I hope this will be a launching pad for us to get going on some of what you muse. Thank you.
ReplyDelete